Table of Contents for Vol. 1, No. 4 Fall 2012

• Introduction
  • Closing the Evaluation Gap
    The Editors
• The Problem Stated
  • Living in a Digital World: Rethinking Peer Review, Collaboration, and Open Access
    Sheila Cavanagh
  • Evaluating Collaborative Digital Scholarship (or, Where Credit is Due)
    Bethany Nowviskie
  • A Call to Redefine Historical Scholarship in the Digital Turn
    Alex Galarza, Jason Heppler and Douglas Seefeldt
• Approaches
  • How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship
    Todd Presner
  • Short Guide To Evaluation Of Digital Work
    Geoffrey Rockwell
  • Promotion and Tenure for Digital Scholarship
    Laura Mandell
  • Evaluating Scholarly Digital Outputs: The Six Layers Approach
    James Smithies
  • Evaluating Multimodal Work, Revisited
    Shannon Christine Mattern
  • Evaluating Digital Humanities Work: Guidelines for Librarians
    Zach Coble
  • Let the Grant Do the Talking
    Sheila Brennan
  • Tenure as a Risk-Taking Venture
    Mark Sample
  • Explaining Digital Humanities in Promotion Documents
    Katherine D. Harris
  • Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Experiences in New Programmes at an Irish University
    Michael Cosgrave, Anna Dowling, Lynn Harding, Róisín O’Brien and Olivia Rohan
• Institutional Guidelines
  • Tenure, Promotion, and the Publicly Engaged Historian
    American Historical Association, National Council on Public History, and Organization of American Historians Working Group on Evaluating Public History Scholarship
  • Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media
    Modern Language Association
  • Documenting a New Media Case
    Evaluation Wiki of the Committee on Information Technology, Modern Language Association
• Resources
  • Bibliography
    The Editors
• Authors