Journal of Digital Humanities

Table of Contents for Vol. 1, No. 4 Fall 2012

Bibliography

The Problem Stated

Blais, Joline, Jon Ippolito, and Owen Smith. New Criteria for New Media. New Media Department, University of Maine, January 2007. http://newmedia.umaine.edu/interarchive/new_criteria_for_new_media.html.

Burgess, Helen J., and Jeanne Hamming. “New Media in the Academy: Labor and the Production of Knowledge in Scholarly Multimedia.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 5, no. 3 (2011). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/3/000102/000102.html.

Cavanagh, Sheila. “Living in a Digital World: Rethinking Peer Review, Collaboration and Open Access.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/living-in-a-digital-world-by-sheila-cavanagh/.

Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. “Peer Review, Judgment, and Reading.” Profession (2011): 196–201. http://www.mlajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.196.

Galarza, Alex, Jason Heppler, and Douglas Seefeldt. “A Call to Redefine Historical Scholarship in the Digital Turn.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/a-call-to-redefine-historical-scholarship-in-the-digital-turn/.

Gibbs, Fred. “Critical Discourse in the Digital Humanities.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 1 (Winter 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-1/critical-discourse-in-digital-humanities-by-fred-gibbs/.

Kelly, T. Mills. “Making Digital Scholarship Count (Part I- of III).” Edwired, June 13, 2008. http://edwired.org/2008/06/13/making-digital-scholarship-count/.

Nowviskie, Bethany. “Evaluating Collaborative Digital Scholarship (or, Where Credit is Due).” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-collaborative-digital-scholarship-by-bethany-nowviskie/.

———. “Where Credit Is Due: Preconditions for the Evaluation of Collaborative Digital Scholarship.” Profession (2011): 169–181. http://www.mlajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.169.

Approaches

Anderson, Steve, and Tara McPherson. “Engaging Digital Scholarship: Thoughts on Evaluating Multimedia Scholarship.” Profession (2011): 136–151. http://www.mlajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.136.

Bates, David. “Peer Review and Evaluation of Digital Resources for the Arts and Humanities.” Institute of Historical Research – Digital Resources, n.d. http://www.history.ac.uk/projects/digital/peer-review.

Brennan, Sheila. “Let the Grant Do the Talking.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/let-the-grant-do-the-talking-by-sheila-brennan/.

Coble, Zach. “Evaluating DH Work: Guidelines for Librarians.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-digital-humanities-work-guidelines-for-librarians-by-zach-coble.

Coletta, Cristina Della. “Guidelines for Promotion and Tenure Committees in Judging Digital Work.” Evaluating Digital Scholarship – NINES/NEH Summer Institutes: 2011-2012, n.d. http://institutes.nines.org/docs/2011-documents/guidelines-for-promotion-and-tenure-committees-in-judging-digital-work/.

Cosgrave, Mike, Anna Dowling, Lynn Harding, Róisín O’Brien, and Olivia Rohan. “Evaluating Digital Scholarship: Experiences in New Programmes at an Irish University.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-digital-scholarship-experiences-in-new-programmes-at-an-irish-university/.

Davidson, Cathy. “How Can A Digital Humanist Get Tenure?” HASTAC, September 17, 2012. http://hastac.org/blogs/cathy-davidson/2012/09/17/how-can-digital-humanist-get-tenure.

Harley, Diane, Jonathan Henke, Shannon Lawrence, et al. Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Berkeley’s Center for Studies in Higher Education, April 5, 2006. http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/publications.php?id=211.

Harris, Katherine. “Explaining Digital Humanities in Promotion Documents.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/explaining-digital-humanities-in-promotion-documents-by-katherine-harris/.

Mandell, Laura. “Promotion and Tenure for Digital Scholarship.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/promotion-and-tenure-for-digital-scholarship-by-laura-mandell/.

Marchionini, G., Plaisant, C., & Komlodi, A. “The People in Digital Libraries: Multifaceted Approaches to Assessing Needs and Impact.” In Digital Library Use: Social Practice in Design and Evaluation, edited by Bishop, A. P. et al., 119–160. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2003.

Mattern, Shannon Christine. “Evaluating Multimodal Work, Revisited.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-multimodal-work-revisited-by-shannon-mattern/.

Presner, Todd. “How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/how-to-evaluate-digital-scholarship-by-todd-presner/.

Rockwell, Geoffrey. “On the Evaluation of Digital Media as Scholarship.” Profession (2011): 152–168. http://www.mlajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1632/prof.2011.2011.1.152.

———. “Short Guide to Evaluation of Digital Work.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/short-guide-to-evaluation-of-digital-work-by-geoffrey-rockwell.

Sample, Mark. “Tenure as a Risk-Taking Venture.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/tenure-as-a-risk-taking-venture-by-mark-sample/.

Shaw, Ryan. “On Tenure and Why Code Can’t Speak for Itself,” n.d. http://aeshin.org/thoughts/on-tenure/.

Smithies, James. “Evaluating Scholarly Digital Outputs: The 6 Layers Approach.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-scholarly-digital-outputs-by-james-smithies/.

Tanner, Simon. Measuring the Impact of Digital Resources: Balanced Value Impact Model. London: King’s College, October 2012. http://www.kdcs.kcl.ac.uk/innovation/impact.html.

Wouters, Paul, and Rodrigo Costas. Users, Narcissism and Control – Tracking the Impact of Scholarly Publications in the 21st Century. SURFfoundation, February 2012. http://www.surf.nl/nl/publicaties/Documents/Users%20narcissism%20and%20control.pdf.

Institutional Guidelines

AAHC. “Tenure Guidelines.” American Association for History and Computing, n.d. http://theaahc.org/about/tenure-guidelines/.

Ahlberg, Kristin, William S. Bryans, Constance B. Schulz, Debbie Ann Doyle, Kathleen Franz, John R. Dichtl, Edward Countryman, Gregory E. Smoak, and Susan Ferentinos. Tenure, Promotion and the Publicly Engaged Historian. AHA/NCPH/OAH Working Group on Evaluating Public History Scholarship, n.d. http://ncph.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/Engaged-Historian.pdf.

Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. “Promotion & Tenure Criteria for Assessing Digital Research in the Humanities.” Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, n.d. http://cdrh.unl.edu/articles/eval_digital_scholar.php.

MLA. “Documenting a New Media Case.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/documenting-a-new-media-case-evaluation-wiki-from-the-mla/.

———. “Guidelines for Editors of Scholarly Editions.” Modern Language Association, n.d. http://www.mla.org/resources/documents/rep_scholarly/cse_guidelines.

———. “Guidelines for Evaluating Work in Digital Humanities and Digital Media.” Journal of Digital Humanities 1, no. 4 (Fall 2012). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/guidelines-for-evaluating-work-in-digital-humanities-and-digital-media-from-the-mla/.

Purdue University. “Evaluation Criteria for the Scholarship of Engagement”, n.d. http://www.vet.purdue.edu/engagement/files/documents/Evaluationcriterion.pdf.

Unsworth, John. “Evaluating Digital Scholarship, Promotion & Tenure Cases.” University of Virginia College and Graduate School of Arts and Sciences – Office of the Dean, n.d. http://artsandsciences.virginia.edu/dean/facultyemployment/evaluating_digital_scholarship.html.

For the Practitioner

Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. “Recommendations for Digital Humanities Projects.” Center for Digital Research in the Humanities, n.d. http://cdrh.unl.edu/articles/best_practices.php.

Koh, Adeline. “The Challenges of Digital Scholarship.” The Chronicle of Higher Education. ProfHacker, January 25, 2012. http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/the-challenges-of-digital-scholarship/38103.

Kramer, Michael. “What Does Digital Humanities Bring to the Table?” Issues in Digital History, September 25, 2012. http://www.michaeljkramer.net/issuesindigitalhistory/blog/?p=862.

Spiro, Lisa. “Tips on Writing a Successful Grant Proposal.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, September 9, 2008. http://digitalscholarship.wordpress.com/2008/09/09/tips-on-writing-a-successful-grant-proposal/.

Summit on Digital Tools for the Humanities. The Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities – University of Virginia, 2006. http://www.iath.virginia.edu/dtsummit/SummitText.pdf.

Visconti, Amanda. “‘Songs of Innocence and of Experience:’ Amateur Users and Digital Texts.” University of Michigan, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71380.