<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Sgarfinkel on Journal of Digital Humanities</title><link>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/author/sgarfinkel/</link><description>Recent content in Sgarfinkel on Journal of Digital Humanities</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/author/sgarfinkel/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Digital Humanities Keywords: A Collaborative Community Web-based Project</title><link>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-3/digital-humanities-keywords-a-collaborative-community-web-based-project/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-3/digital-humanities-keywords-a-collaborative-community-web-based-project/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="poster"&gt;Poster&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;iframe class="gde-frame" scrolling="no" src="https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjournalofdigitalhumanities.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F11%2FDH-Keywords.pdf&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;embedded=true" style="width:100%; height:500px; border: none;"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/DH-Keywords.pdf"&gt;Download (PDF, 373KB)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="abstract"&gt;Abstract&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the field of digital humanities has expanded dramatically in recent years, it has also struggled to define—or perhaps more correctly, to redefine—itself across a seemingly divergent set of its practitioners’ backgrounds, interests, priorities, methodologies, and institutional settings that yet still have something fundamental in common. From critical code studies to corpus linguistics to tool creation to online pedagogy, digital humanities practitioners surely share the &lt;em&gt;digital&lt;/em&gt; and the &lt;em&gt;humanities&lt;/em&gt; yet may work within different fundamental paradigms, asking different questions and using different methodologies in the service of achieving very different final goals (Gold, Kirschenbaum). How, beneath the shared surface of this broadly cast “big tent” of digital humanities, can such a diverse community of practice come together in fruitful and mutually beneficial ways? What can we as scholars do to facilitate this convergence in a broad discursive space where the ethic of “more hack, less yack” can sometimes discourage the meaningful exchanges of ideas that still need to happen, the collective negotiations of purpose that so often serve as the source of new insights?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>