<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rsanderson on Journal of Digital Humanities</title><link>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/author/rsanderson/</link><description>Recent content in Rsanderson on Journal of Digital Humanities</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/author/rsanderson/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>RDF: Resource Description Failures and Linked Data Letdowns</title><link>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-3/rdf-resource-description-failures-and-linked-data-letdowns/</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-3/rdf-resource-description-failures-and-linked-data-letdowns/</guid><description>&lt;h3 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The topic of the Semantic Web, more recently rebranded as Linked (Open) Data, has been in discussed in digital humanities and related disciplines since its inception. Now, more than a decade later, the technology has had more than enough time to run through the hype curve towards the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hype_cycle" title="'Hype Cycle' in Wikipedia"&gt;Plateau of Productivity&lt;/a&gt;. But where are we really in that timeline? Some sectors have embraced it, and others are catching up quickly, but significant obstacles to adoption remain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>