https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/author/matthew-slaats/Recent content in Matthew-Slaats on Journal of Digital HumanitiesHugoen-USSat, 01 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/3-1/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-scholarly-publishing-across-printdigital-streams/Sat, 01 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0000https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/3-1/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-scholarly-publishing-across-printdigital-streams/<p>Poster</p> <iframe class="gde-frame" scrolling="no" src="https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjournalofdigitalhumanities.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F01%2FDH_Poster.pdf&amp;hl=en_US&amp;embedded=true" style="width:100%; height:500px; border: none;"></iframe> <p><a href="https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/DH_Poster.pdf">Download (PDF, 3.06MB)</a></p> <h3 id="abstract">Abstract</h3> <p><em>Debates in the Digital Humanities</em>, an edited collection featuring contributions from over forty DH scholars and practitioners, straddles the line between print and digital publication. The first edition of the printed text, which was published by the University of Minnesota Press in January 2012, was composed predominately of essays but also incorporated a variety of web-based materials such as blog posts, tweets, and wiki pages. The printed book was, from the earliest stages of the publication process, intertwined with digital platforms: following the model of peer-to-peer review described by Kathleen Fitzpatrick in <em>Planned Obsolescence</em>, all essays in the book were part of a semi-public, web-based review process that mixed new forms of peer-to-peer review with more traditional models of publisher-based blind peer review.</p>