<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Achristie on Journal of Digital Humanities</title><link>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/author/achristie/</link><description>Recent content in Achristie on Journal of Digital Humanities</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/author/achristie/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Review of The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media (2014)</title><link>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/3-2/review-of-the-johns-hopkins-guide-to-digital-media-2014/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/3-2/review-of-the-johns-hopkins-guide-to-digital-media-2014/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Ryan, Marie-Laure, Lori Emerson, and Benjamin J. Robertson, eds. &lt;em&gt;The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media&lt;/em&gt;. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2014. Print.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current scholarly activity in digital media reflects a convergence of cultural and political critique with technological investigation, engagement, and practice, and the challenge to creating any guide or introduction to digital media that it risks codifying — and thereby diminishing — the diversity of approaches, methodologies, and theoretical approaches to be found. The &lt;em&gt;Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media&lt;/em&gt;, edited by Marie-Laure Ryan, Lori Emerson, and Benjamin J. Robertson, resists collapsing the many and varied potential trajectories of digital media studies into singular narratives by weaving intellectual diversity and vibrancy throughout its representation of the disciplinary fabric of digital media studies.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>